Index guideUnited States

The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index

The same five hundred companies, each counted once. Not really an alternative benchmark — more a diagnostic instrument for reading what the headline index is actually doing.

2003Launched
503Securities
EqualWeighting
QuarterlyRebalance

This index holds exactly the same constituents as the S&P 500. The only difference is that each one gets an identical share rather than a share proportional to its market value, reset on a quarterly schedule.

That single change turns a company weighted at seven percent into one weighted at roughly two tenths of a percent — the same as the smallest constituent in the index.

What it is actually for

Its most valuable use is not as a portfolio. It is as a measurement of breadth.

Reading the gapCap weighted against equal weighted
WIDE GAP — A FEW NAMES DID THE WORKcap weightedequal weightedNARROW GAP — THE MARKET ROSE BROADLYBoth panels show the same five hundred companies. The distance between the two lines is theanswer to a question the headline index cannot answer on its own: did most constituentsparticipate, or did a handful carry the whole move?Schematic. The gap has been unusually wide in recent years, consistent with the concentrationdescribed on the S&P 500 page.
Neither index is more correct. They answer different questions about the same set of companies.

When the headline S&P 500 rises sharply and the equal-weighted version does not, the gain came from the largest constituents. When they move together, participation was broad. No other single comparison tells you this as directly, which is why market commentary reaches for it constantly.

What equal weighting actually does

It creates a size tilt. Giving the 400th-largest company the same weight as the largest means the index is materially more exposed to the smaller end of the large-cap universe. Much of its performance difference is explained by that tilt rather than by the weighting scheme being cleverer.

It forces contrarian trading. Rebalancing back to equal weights means selling what has risen and buying what has fallen, every quarter, mechanically. Cap weighting does the opposite by construction: whatever appreciates automatically becomes a larger share.

It costs more to run. Quarterly rebalancing across 500 positions generates turnover that a cap-weighted index does not, and that turnover has a cost. Funds tracking equal-weight indexes generally carry higher expenses.

The deeper question underneath this index is whether cap weighting is a neutral choice. Its defenders say it reflects the market as it is. Its critics say it mechanically allocates more capital to whatever has already appreciated most, which is a strategy rather than a neutral stance. Equal weighting is the cleanest available counter-example, which is why the comparison keeps recurring.

Facts worth knowing

  • Identical constituents to the S&P 500The same 503 securities across 500 companies. Only the weights differ.
  • Rebalanced quarterlyWeights drift with prices between rebalances and are reset on schedule.
  • Every constituent is roughly 0.2%Against over 7% for the largest company in the cap-weighted version.
  • It underperforms in concentrated marketsAnd tends to hold up better when leadership broadens — the mirror image of the headline index.
  • Other equal-weight variants existIncluding sector-level equal-weight indexes, used for the same diagnostic purpose within an industry.

Common questions

Is equal weighting better than cap weighting?

Neither is better in the abstract. Equal weighting carries a size tilt and higher turnover; cap weighting carries concentration. They suit different objectives and different market conditions.

Why compare the two indexes?

The gap between them measures breadth — whether a market move came from most constituents or from a few very large ones.

Does it hold different companies?

No. Identical membership; only the weighting differs.

Sources: S&P Dow Jones Indices methodology for the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.

General educational information about market structure. Not investment advice or a recommendation regarding any security, index, or fund. Past performance does not indicate future results. Smartvest Securities is not a registered broker-dealer or investment adviser. Constituent filings are available through FreeEDGAR.


No Financial or Investment Advice: The content on this Site is for informational purposes only, you should not construe any such information or other material as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. Nothing contained on our Site constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, or offer by Smartvest Securities to buy or sell securities or other financial instruments in this or in in any other jurisdiction in which such solicitation or offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. Nothing in the Site constitutes professional and/or financial advice, nor does any information on the Site constitute a comprehensive or complete statement of the matters discussed or the law relating thereto. Smartvest Securities is not a fiduciary by virtue of any person’s or entity’s use of or access to the Site. You alone assume the sole responsibility of evaluating the merits and risks associated with the use of any information or other content on the Site before making any decisions based on such information or other content. In exchange for using the Site, you agree not to hold Smartvest Securities, or its affiliates liable for any possible claim for damages arising from any decision you make based on information or other content made available to you through the Site.